A running log of what we ship: real output against real brands, with the QA records behind it. No brand is named without written permission.
We pointed the demo instance at a store it had never seen. It extracted voice, palette, type, and 25 products from the live site, rebuilt the workspace theme, and generated 28 email templates in that brand’s visual language. The same session, the platform generated a product-bundle landing page that scored 74/100 against our QA rubric (70 is the passing bar) and was approved in the review workflow.
A seasonal campaign email for a grooming brand, a product-bundle landing page for a personal-care brand, and a sampler-to-subscription campaign email for a coffee brand. Our team built each one from the brand’s public site and catalog, then put it through the same adversarial QA gate the platform’s output faces. Round one failed all three, with documented defects including an invented product claim that contradicted live catalog data and a fixed-width layout that would overflow on small screens. Every defect was fixed and re-verified against live product data before the artifacts cleared.
The full platform now runs as a standing demo: campaigns, flows, landing pages, and segmentation generated from a brand system, with every output gated by human review before it ships. Walkthroughs happen on audit calls.
Why no names: this work was built from public storefronts and catalogs, without the brands’ involvement, so they stay unnamed. Client results will appear here only with written permission.
Start with the audit: $300, one week, and you keep a finished, deploy-ready artifact in your brand voice whether or not we go further. Credited in full toward your install.